Introspecting Pandora – an untold perspective

The fictional exoplanetary moon, Pandora as a biodiversity of bioluminescent species ranging from hexapodal animals to other types of exotic fauna & flora and with a vast neural network spanning the entire lunar surface into which the family members can connect depict as being located in the Alpha Centauri A ( brightest star in the southern constellation of Centaurs[ in astronomy and navigation, the celestial sphere – an imaginary sphere { a perfectly round geometrical ( branch of mathematics(6) [ the abstract study of subjects encompassing quantity { (7) a property ( (8) in modern philosophy ( (9) a category of philosophy [ (10) a study of general and fundamental problems { (11) an obstacle, impediment, difficulty or challenge, or any situation that invites resolution; the resolution of which is recognized as a solution or contribution towards a known purpose or goal. A problem implies a desired outcome coupled with an apparent deficiency, doubt ( (12) a status between belief [ (13) the psychological state in which an individual holds a proposition { (14)in philosophy ( (15) the study of general and fundamental problems, such as those connected with reality [ (16) the state of things as they actually exist, rather than as they may appear or might be imagined. IN wider definition, reality includes everything that is and has been { (17) extremely broad concept encompassing subjective ( (18) refers to the subject [ (19) a being that has subjective experiences, subjective consciousness { (20) referring to a state of consciousness ( (21) the quality or state of being aware of an external object or something within oneself. It has been defined as subjectivity [ (22)referring to the subject { (23) in philosophy

] and disbelief involves uncertainty ( (24) is a term used in subtly different ways in a number of fields, including physics [ (25) in quantum mechanics { (26) is a branch of psychics ( (27) a natural science [ a branch of science { (28) a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge ( (29) a familiarity with someone or something, which can include facts[ { (i) something that has really occurred or is actually the case. The usual test for a statement of fact is verifiability, that is whether it can proven to correspond to experience ( (ii) a general concept [ (iii) defined variously by different sources. Philosophers study the general and fundamental problems { (iv) an obstacle, impediment, difficulty or challenge, or any situation that invites resolution such as those connected with reality  ( (v) is the state of things that actually exists, rather than as they may appear or might be imagined. In a wider definition, reality includes everything that is and has been, whether or not it is observable [ (vi) either an activity of a living being, such as a human – the only living members of the genus which in biology { (vii) a natural science concerned with the study of life ( (viii) a characteristic that distinguishes objects that have  signaling and self-sustaining  processes[ (ix) a biological process of a living organism { (x) any contiguous ( (xi) continuous mass, or a series of things in contact or in proximity. In different meaning, contiguity is the state of being contiguous. The concept was first set out in the law of contiguity, one of Aristotle’s also known as Hellenes, an ethnic group [ (xii) a group in social sciences { (xiii) a field of study ( (xiv) a branch of [ (xv) knowledge { (xvi) a familiarity with someone or something, which include facts. ( (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x) (xi) (xii) (xiii) (xiv) (xv) (xvi) )

Standard reference works are often used to check facts. Scientific facts are verified by repeatable experiments, information in its most restricted sense, is a sequence in the field of Mathematics (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) (28) (29) )…n-3


Kurt Gödel’s Ontological Argument

How does a mathematician get mixed up in the God-business?

Gödel was a mystic, whose mathematical research exemplified a philosophical stance akin to the Neo-Platonics. In this respect, Gödel had as much in common with the medieval theologians and philosophers as the twentieth-century mathematicians who pioneered the theory of computation and modern computer science. However, a deeper reason for Gödel’s contribution to the ontological argument is that the most sophisticated versions of the ontological argument are nowadays written in terms of modal logic, a branch of logic that was familiar to the medieval scholastics, and axiomatized by C. I. Lewis (not to be confused with C. S. Lewis, or C. Day Lewis for that matter). It turns out that modal logic is not only a useful language in which to discuss God, it is also a useful language for proof theory, the study of what can and cannot be proved in mathematical systems of deduction. Issues of completeness of mathematical systems, the independence of axioms from other axioms, and issue of the consistency of formal mathematical systems are all part of proof theory.


Talking about proof theory often feels like discourse about God:


When you talk about God, you have to discuss issues like “if God created the Universe, then who created God?” In proof theory you have to discuss issues like “if a statement is true, then is it true that we can prove the statement?” There is a bit of a feeling that we are arguing by pulling ourselves up by our own bootstraps.

In metaphysics, one discusses the possible existence of counterfactual worlds in which God does not exist. In proof theory, one examines the independence of an axiom by finding models in which the axiom fails.

In metaphysics, one can speak of “modal collapse” in which any proposition which is true at all is necessarily true. In proof theory can speak of “completeness” in which every statement which can be consistently added to the axiom system can be proved from the other axioms.

Some of the pioneering work of Kurt Gödel showed that the modal logic of philosophers which was used to analyze the ontological argument for the existence of God was also very useful in proof theory and meta mathematics.


It’s difficult to tell what is being suggested here. This theory is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical but nevertheless a sincere attempt in praising James Cameroon – the genius.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s